By Way of DiveintoMark's RSS Feed

  • The acme of the CSS-fu, (Warning! the link that follows leads to a page that makes absolutely no sense in screen readers. Don’t bother; just get someone to tell you about it.) a house built purely of CSS rules and empty markup. I suppose you’d have to be a web designer to know the full horror of the code underlying this page.
  • Web blog comment spam is become more common. MoveableType seems to be getting hit the worst. Since I use a highly modified version of Greymatter and my web log is far off the beaten trail, currently I am safe. Still, interesting reading. By the way, Musings is by far the most futuristic website I’ve come across as far as XML and the Semantic Web is concerned. Just read the source and documentation about it.
Posted in Miscellaneous | Comments Off on By Way of DiveintoMark's RSS Feed

It makes a lot of sense when you think about it.

Although I haven’t signed up with these folks, I think that mentally I’ve been a member of the Voluntary Human Extinction MovemenT (VHEMT) for many years now. We should stop breeding and get off the planet. That’s the only way the ecosystem is going to recover. I found these folks by way of this interesting interview on The Speculist.

Posted in Miscellaneous | Comments Off on It makes a lot of sense when you think about it.

Presentation, semantics and structure in markup

Smarter people than me have been thinking about the separation of presentation and structure in Web documents in the last week. Some of these arguments seem like angels dancing on pinheads. For me it’s simple. The goal should be to organize and assemble your Web documents with the least amount of markup and code possible. I think that elegance in markup and code is a goal we can all agree with. Layout tables are semantically meaningless bulk that can now be done without, thanks to the elegance of using a separate markup specifically designed for presentation, CSS. If this makes your documents semantically pure and more accessible to assistive technology, so much the sweeter.

Posted in Webmastering | Comments Off on Presentation, semantics and structure in markup

Installed the style switcher I promised.

There are still a few bugs to work out. For example, it’s not planting a cookie in my browsers. This needs to happen for the selected style to persist. I also have to install it for all the pages that are outside my web log script. Anyway, it works, sort of, Just invoke the link text, “Turn Off Style,” to see this site as Netscape 4 or Arachne sees it.

The whole point to this is to provide a way to make my site more accessible to people with mobile phones, screen readers or screen magnifiers. Turning off the style snaps my pages into a linear, content-first, navigation-second layout. Combined with keyboard shortcuts to quickly jump to navigation, if needed, this should make my site more accessible for people with motor impairments too. Once I get the bugs out here, I plan to transfer this code to the sites I maintain for others.

Posted in Webmastering | Comments Off on Installed the style switcher I promised.

Once again Hollywood fails to take a chance.

Okay. I just got wind that they are going to make a movie about a murder mystery in a future of ubiquitous robots. They’ve got the audacity to call it I, Robot. Now, I think it’s really cool that they’ve got Will Smith to play one of the lead characters in the movie. Hollywood’s portrayal of the future definitely needs more people of color in it–sometimes it seems like the future only takes place in Finland or something.

But here is my problem with them calling this movie I, Robot. Look who they have playing Susan Calvin. If you ever read any of Asimov’s robot stories that feature Calvin, you know she didn’t look anything like this. Lois Smith, the geneticist in Minority Report, seems infinitely more appropriate to me. Someone like Kate Reid, who played the microbiologist in The Andromeda Strain, is much closer to Asimov’s idea of Calvin. If we need someone younger, fine–how ’bout, Kathy Bates or Camryn Manhiem? Or someone thin, yet very plain looking. Calvin wasn’t a barbie doll. She was a devastatingly intelligent, tough, and yes unattractive, spinster of a gal who had no patience for idiocy. That’s how Asimov wrote her. That’s her appeal to me.

Now, I don’t have any problem with attractive actors or actresses in film, but what they’ve put together here for I, Robot isn’t what Asimov wrote. Why is Hollywood so afraid of putting older, or less attractive, women in stereotype-defying roles? Ah, never mind. I’ll probably go see the flick anyway and simply ignore any attempts to link it with Asimov’s work.

Posted in Movies | Comments Off on Once again Hollywood fails to take a chance.

US Automobile Companies Look Stupid Again

When California passed its low-emission vehicle laws, I made a prediction: US auto makers would whine and drag their feet and then look really stupid as European and Asian car companies roared ahead with the necessary technology at competitive prices. Japanese hybrid cars are selling like gangbusters.

Posted in Science and Engineering | Comments Off on US Automobile Companies Look Stupid Again

The BBC reverses the polarity of the neutron flow

This just in from the Wire of Insanely Cool News, after a forteen year hiatus, the Beeb decides to revive Dr. Who.

My aunt introduced this science fiction series to me, during an evening of watching KQED, way back in grade school in the early Seventies, during the reign of Jon Pertwee. I know I said that science fiction is dead only a few weeks ago, but I’ll be watching for this to syndicate on Public Television or the SciFi Network in the months to come!

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on The BBC reverses the polarity of the neutron flow

Verisign breaks the Internet

This news is a few days old but still important. Verisign, which owns Network Solutions, has added a wildcard record to the .COM and .NET top level domain DNS zones. What this means is that fighting spam is harder, e-mail address resolution is harder and Web domain typos give Verisign free advertising. This stinks, right?

Posted in Webmastering | Comments Off on Verisign breaks the Internet

Science fiction is very nearly dead

This might be news to some people, but science fiction, one of the major literary forms of the XX century, is dead. I say this a former, rabid fan of hard SF. SF really has nowhere left to go. Why? Because the future is going to get very, very, very weird and there’s not really a lot we can do about it. I mean the future is going to get incomprehensibily weird, weird beyond the human ken, and this is hard to write stories about.

Posted in Books | Comments Off on Science fiction is very nearly dead

I don't believe in American exceptionalism

What is American exceptionalism and how come I don’t believe in it? Well there are probably a lot of people who will argue with my definition, but here it is:

  • The United States is not merely unique, it is special, alone among the countries of the Earth.

I don’t buy this.

If you think about it honestly, there really isn’t anything that exists in the United States that doesn’t exist in some form elsewhere in the world or in history. We didn’t invent democracy. We didn’t invent human rights. We didn’t invent capitalism. We didn’t invent religious tolerance. Arguably the only things we invented are pop music forms like bluegrass, the blues, jazz and rock, and even those rapidly spread into the world and then came back to us greatly transformed.

Think what world would have been like if the United States never existed. Yes, history would be totally different, but I think there would be some trends that would have emerged anyway. The Industrial Revolution would have happened anyway. European powers would have still been struggling for dominance and this would have eventually lead to global war. The world would have been colonized and then decolonized. Technical progress would still have occurred, perhaps more slowly, perhaps even more rapidly, but it would have occurred. In other words the world wouldn’t have been better or worse, it would have just been different. That’s all.

We are not God’s chosen people. We are not the only best and brightest in the world. We are not exceptional. Yes, we have the greatest concentration of economic, military and therefore political and cultural power in the world currently, but this is by no means permanent. One only has to look at the rapid advances of China and India to realize that. The United States may not last forever, and the world isn’t doomed simply because we cease to exist. We are not always right. And sometimes we need to listen to the rest of the world. We can be arrogant and hypocritical in our ideals. But to be fair, every country on the face of the Earth and in the depths of history has been guilty of arrogance and hypocrisy. We are not exceptional in that either. We are unique, but then so is everybody else.

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on I don't believe in American exceptionalism