The pill to end procrastination

When I was young, I felt very bad about not being a better student. I felt bad about not being able to force myself to do the mental ditch-digging necessary to acquire skill in things–to make myself practice, practice, practice. Studying for exams or doing homework was always such a chore for me. I had always envied my friends with their worker-ant-like duty and devotion to bettering themselves.

As I got older and came to understand myself and world a little better, I learned to feel better about myself. In spite of my general mental laziness, I have still managed to become fairly intelligent about things in my own unique way. I’ve since learned that there are advantages to being a dabbler and a jack of all trades, rather then a good study and an in-depth expert. The world needs both.

Still I am quite intrigued by news that research has found a way to isolate the biochemical tendency towards diligence in monkeys. Is ambition in pill form far behind? Will students start abusing these to crack down before exams?

Posted in Science and Engineering | Comments Off on The pill to end procrastination

An Introspective Design Moment

I’ve been a serious web technician since 1997 and an unserious one since 1996. So why is it that my CSS designs still appears so bland to me? It’s not the fault of CSS. If anything, as will be made plain, I’m not using cascading stylesheets enough.

I think the fault lies in two things:

  1. I don’t use enough divs and spans.
  2. I don’t use enough images

With generic containers like divs and spans I could engage more intricate position and background color schemes. With more divs and spans I could place more images as backgrounds or use a variation of Fahrner’s image replacement.

This could be problematic though. It would slow my page serving as images loaded and having all those divs and spans dilutes the semantic markup, even if I name them with classes and ids that have semantic meaning.

The other thing is I am not very practiced in the finer arts. I haven’t done much branding or logo design. This is something I have to work more on.

Posted in Webmastering | Comments Off on An Introspective Design Moment

Grumble, i, robot, grumble

Well, I’m not surprised. The movie, I, Robot, apparently lacks depth. It’s impossible for any project that large, involving that much money, to have any depth.

But it’s still disappointing. Here we are on the edge of an explosion in artificial intelligence and the issues aren’t really being explored.

Posted in Movies | Comments Off on Grumble, i, robot, grumble

Here's a reason why I'm glad to live in a constitutional republic.

Prince Charles of the UK weighs in on nanotechnology. I guess the guy is entitled to his opinion, but you’d figure he make an attempt to be better informed about it. But to be fair, we have our share of foolish notions about scientific research here too.

Posted in The Future | Comments Off on Here's a reason why I'm glad to live in a constitutional republic.

Something I suspected for a long time

By way of the Web Standards Project I came across an essay that, among discussing other things, states that web browsers will eventually become, the only application platform that matters, and that Microsoft may be ignoring this to their peril. (Although, I pretty sure that are some wily folks over at the Lazy M Ranch who have realized this and have been thinking about the best way to do this or destroy it.)

Many others have been saying this for some time. The only way to gain market share now is to make certain that your company writes the browsing agents for most of the devices that people use. This line of thinking goes that, Microsoft could render Linux as less threatening by writing a browser for it that was better than Mozilla. At that point Linux client systems just become another set of devices. Maybe there is something obvious that I am missing here, but it seems like that argument is sound.

Obviously you wouldn’t want to run graphically intensive games inside a browser and you wouldn’t want to edit and render CGI inside a web browser, but those have always been applications that depended strongly on hardware. In these days of ridiculous clockspeeds and enormous number crunching power, most productivity applications are easier than spit and can run on some really stupid hardware. This has been the case for many years now.

That’s why the desktop market has slowed down so much–the breaking point really occurred just a few years before the release of Windows 3. It was inertia, games, video editing and wily marketing that carried the hardware market forward until now. But it’s beginning not to work anymore. This is why Microsoft is moving into the game console market and why Intel is trying to tie itself into things other than CPUs, like communications and graphics. You’re not going to generate the scenes of Shrek II on a mobile phone but, you are going to write documents and send mail on a mobile phone. Thus browsers are good enough for most of these applications.

I know this is a weird entry for me to write and that most of my friends in hardspace don’t care. But it seemed important to me, so here it is.

Posted in Computer Support | Comments Off on Something I suspected for a long time

The ultimate elevator must be built!

Recently a scientist predicted that we could have an operating space elevator within 15 years if a mere ten billion dollars is spent. The cynic in me thinks he is underestimating the cost, but I do agree with the time frame. If we spent the money, we could do it by that date.

This is something that should be built. I think it matters much more than Bush’s diversionary promises about exploring Mars. It matters more than than a privately fund jet-powered joyride called SpaceShipOne. I’d say, that in some ways, it matters even more than Sputnik or Apollo. It matters because it actually makes space travel, really, really cheap. Once leaving Earth’s gravity becomes extremely cheap, everything else follows. The industrialization and infrastructure of space can finally take off.

Posted in The Future | Comments Off on The ultimate elevator must be built!

Fossil Fuel Subsidies Must End

Post-industrial countries subsidize the fossil fuel industries by about 73 billion dollars every year. On the other hand between 1 and 3 percent of the 40 billion dollars spent energy investment in developing countries is actually spent on renewable and alternate forms of energy. This is according to the report, The Price of Power, which was released by the New Economics Foundation, a think tank based in the UK.

The gist of the argument the report makes is that fossil fuel use not only contributes to global warming but also perpetuates poverty in the developing world by keeping citizens dependent on centralized energy distribution systems based on fossil fuels. If India, China or Indonesia are ever going to reach a standard of living equal to that of the post-industrial world, they’re going to have to invest in decentralized, small-scale, energy sources, like solar, wind, biomass and hydro.

Posted in The Future | Comments Off on Fossil Fuel Subsidies Must End

Proprietary formats stink

Chris Phillips over at Curb Cut Learning has a rant, which I agree with, that HTML is better than PDF for accessibility.

In fact, I go further than he does, HTML is already good enough for most people. Maybe professional printing houses still need PDF or MSWord but John Public, who merely wants to print a flyer for his lost dog, can do that just fine in HTML with a little CSS on the side.

I remember when I was a temp at Microsoft and some W3C guys came by to give a presentation about web standards and web accessibility, which mostly fell on deaf ears. It was telling to me, when my boss converted their presentation, which was in nice simple HTML into PowerPoint. My boss’ fear was legitimate. He was afraid other staff in the company wouldn’t read the W3C presentation if it remained in HTML on some file server someplace–people stick with what they know.

That incident stuck with me though. I realized that most of my job as the webmaster for the Microsoft Accessibility site was simply converting Microsoft Word files into something that could reasonably be called HTML 3.2. To this day, as webmaster for several customers in my own business, most of my work consists of converting Acrobat and Word files into XHTML 1 strict. This is work that shouldn’t exist.

The problem is that semantic purity requires thought on the part of an author. Most people don’t want to think about whether a piece of text is a book title, a programming variable, an author’s contact information or emphasis and intonation. They just italicize it, at least in anglophone countries, and let the world figure it out.

Somehow we have to make authoring tools that handle this semantic stuff automatically for people who have better things to do. Otherwise Berners-Lee’s dream isn’t going to manifest.

Even still, HTML is already good enough to suplant most proprietary document formats for most people for most purposes.

Posted in Webmastering | Comments Off on Proprietary formats stink

Plucky little space robots

In contrast to yesterday’s entry, let’s mention the Cassini space probe. The Cassini-Huygens Mission is already returning great data from Saturn and its moons and in a few days will assume parking orbit for four years worth of exploring!

Let’s imagine the expense of sending humans to do something like this. Staggering, eh? Robots are cheap, very cheap.

Posted in Science and Engineering | Comments Off on Plucky little space robots

Why I am not impressed with SpaceShipOne

Short Answer: It’s only suborbital. It’s just an exotic, jet-powered joyride for rich people.

Long answer: Look, if purely private funding built something like a space elevator, then I’d be impressed, then I’d say NASA, ESA and the RKA need to close up shop. But that’s not gonna happen. Even if Bill Gates and Paul Allen spent all their money, it would equal only a small fraction of the money (Military, engineering and scientific research budgets.) spent by governments around the world on space use. That’s just facts. If you want to explore and colonize a harsh environment, expect enormous government subsidy and a lot of interesting but monetarily profitless scientific research. We will one day colonize space and, the private sector will play noteworthy roles but, it’s certain that the governments of the world will play the biggest part in that process.

Why am I so harsh? Why am I such a killjoy? I was born in the Sixties and grew up as a nerd in the Seventies. This means I read a lot of libertarian-flavored hard science fiction and rants that spun fantasies about the miracles of private funding even as I watched the United States and Soviet Union scale back their ambitions after their military goals had been achieved. The contradiction was so obvious to me as a sorely disappointed teenager as the Eighties dawned. As I prepared to become a physics student in university, it became clear to me exactly how hard space travel really is. I grew increasingly irritated with certain science fiction authors ranting about how the government was screwing things up. Their promises of a bright future created by some privately funded miracle rang hollow to me.

Technology just doesn’t work that way. There’s a lot of hidden, subsidized, profitless scientific research lurking in the past of every technology we buy and sell today. The Libertarians forget that. By the time a piece of technology becomes commercially viable, all the hard work has already been done.

Anyway after reading all the gushing news stories about the privately funded miracle of SpaceShipOne, this rant triggered in me. It may be unwelcome news to worshipers of Ayn Rand and Heinlein, but NASA and JPL ain’t close closing up shop anytime soon.

Posted in The Future | Comments Off on Why I am not impressed with SpaceShipOne